Latest
Checked
Exchange · Availability checked Oct. 22, 2026
A CFTC-designated exchange whose event contracts also appear inside partner apps. Kalshi does not publish a state-by-state list we could confirm. Kalshi does not publish a list of US states where it is unavailable; its help center and Member Agreement name only foreign jurisdictions as restricted. Court orders have made it block sports contracts (and, in Nevada and Washington, other categories) in Nevada, Michigan and Washington, which it told users there.
Bluebook
Is Kalshi Legal? States, Lawsuits and Regulation, Prediction Market Laws (last updated Oct. 22, 2026), https://predictionmarketlaws.com/platforms/kalshi.
APA
Prediction Market Laws. (2026, October 22). Is Kalshi Legal? States, Lawsuits and Regulation. https://predictionmarketlaws.com/platforms/kalshi
Source: Kalshi Help Center: Signing Up as an Individual (updated March 10, 2026), checked Oct. 22, 2026.
Next: Kalshi's response due Nov. 918 days
Docketed Sept. 8Nov. 9
Resolves Yes if the Court grants review in Flaherty v. KalshiEX, No if it denies the petition.
Supreme Court No. 26-299. Source: Supreme Court docket
Next: New York's optional reply on the CFTC's new rules due Oct. 231 day
Argued Sept. 14Oct. 23
Resolves Yes if the court grants the federal government's preliminary injunction motion in United States v. New York, in whole or in part. No if it denies it.
S.D.N.Y. No. 1:26-cv-03404. Source: DeFi Rate tracker
Next: show-cause hearing Nov. 2433 days
Motion filed Sept. 29Nov. 24
Resolves Yes if the Ingham County court finds Kalshi in civil contempt of its Sept. 1 injunction, No if it declines.
Ingham County Circuit Court No. 26-1087-CZ. Source: DeFi Rate
Next: Kalshi's opening brief due Nov. 615 days
Appeal docketed Sept. 17Nov. 6
Resolves Yes if the court reverses or vacates the denial of Kalshi's preliminary injunction in KalshiEX v. Bird, No if it affirms.
Eighth Circuit No. 26-2874. Source: Court docket
No decision date set168 days since argument
Argued May 7Pending
Resolves Yes if the court reverses or vacates the denial of Kalshi's preliminary injunction in KalshiEX v. Martin, No if it affirms.
Fourth Circuit No. 25-1892. Source: Court docket
No decision date set13 days since the petition
Petition filed Oct. 9Pending
Resolves Yes if the court grants panel rehearing or rehearing en banc in KalshiEX v. Schuler and KalshiEX v. Orgel, No if it denies both.
Sixth Circuit Nos. 26-3196 and 26-5235. Source: Kalshi's petition (PDF)
No decision date set43 days since the petition
Petition filed Sept. 9Pending
Resolves Yes if the court grants rehearing en banc in KalshiEX v. Assad, No if it denies it.
Ninth Circuit No. 25-7516. Source: Court filing citing the petition (PDF)
No decision date set171 days since argument
Argued May 4Pending
Resolves Yes if the Supreme Judicial Court affirms the Superior Court's preliminary injunction against Kalshi, No if it vacates or reverses it.
Mass. SJC No. SJC-13906. Source: Bloomberg
No decision date set78 days since the appeal was docketed
Appeal docketed Aug. 5Pending
Resolves Yes if the court reverses or vacates the district court's judgment for Utah in KalshiEx v. Cox, No if it affirms.
Tenth Circuit No. 26-4100. Source: Court docket
Utah: State lawsuit
Attorney General Brown sued Kalshi, four Kalshi subsidiaries and two Pennsylvania-based trading firms that supply pricing and liquidity in Utah's Third District Court, alleging that Kalshi operates as an unlicensed gambling business. The state seeks an order barring Kalshi from taking Utah wagers, enforced through a court-approved geolocation tool, plus fees it estimates at $30.6 million to $61.2 million and about $5.5 million in restitution for Utah users' losses.
Source: The Salt Lake Tribune
California: Court order
The Ninth Circuit's mandate was entered in the district court, which set a case-management conference for October 21, 2026.
Source: DeFi Rate legal tracker
Illinois: Court order
Judge Pacold granted in part the injunction motions in the Coinbase, CFTC and Kalshi cases, finding Illinois's licensing and related criminal provisions likely preempted as to the contracts at issue; the fee challenge was continued for more briefing.
Source: N.D. Ill. Memorandum Opinion and Order, No. 1:26-cv-03659, Dkt. 99
Ohio: Court order
A Sixth Circuit panel (Gibbons, writing, with Clay and Bloomekatz) affirmed the denial of Kalshi's preliminary injunction. It held that sports event contracts are not swaps and, in the alternative, that the Commodity Exchange Act does not preempt Ohio's gambling laws.
Source: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit opinion 26a0272p.06
Tennessee: Court order
The Sixth Circuit vacated the preliminary injunction and remanded, holding that sports event contracts are not swaps and that the Commodity Exchange Act does not preempt Tennessee's gambling laws.
Source: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit opinion 26a0272p.06
Montana: Court order
The court dismissed the case on a joint stipulation filed Sept. 17, 2026: claims against the five commission members with prejudice, and against the attorney general, a Division official and the Division without prejudice. The defendants agreed not to begin enforcement over Kalshi's event contracts until Kalshi's Ninth Circuit rehearing bid in KalshiEX v. Assad is resolved, after which the attorney general's side must give 30 days' written notice.
Source: Joint stipulation of dismissal, D. Mont. No. 6:26-cv-00028 (via DeFi Rate)
California: Court order
A unanimous Ninth Circuit panel (No. 25-7504; Judges Murguia, McKeown and Paez) reversed the denial of a preliminary injunction on the IGRA claim, finding the tribes likely to succeed, and remanded for the other injunction factors without itself ordering an injunction; it affirmed dismissal of the tribes' Lanham Act claim.
Source: InGame
Missouri: Cease-and-desist
The attorney general demanded each operator stop offering sports contracts to people in Missouri, or obtain a Gaming Commission license, pay the 10% wagering tax and fees, and bar under-21 users, within 30 days; the letters were announced Sept. 18, 2026.
Iowa: Court order
Judge Stephen Locher denied Kalshi's preliminary-injunction motion, finding Kalshi unlikely to show its sports contracts are swaps, which leaves Iowa free to enforce its gaming laws while the case continues.
Source: SBC Americas
Utah: Court order
The Tenth Circuit denied Kalshi's emergency motion for an injunction pending appeal, leaving Utah free to enforce while the appeal proceeds.
Source: SBC Americas
Michigan: Court order
Judge Aquilina granted a preliminary injunction barring Kalshi's sports-wagering activity, deposits, account funding and advertising in Michigan, with geolocation rules and $500,000-per-day penalties, until a final order.
Nevada: Court order
A Ninth Circuit panel (Judges R. Nelson, Bade and Lee; No. 25-7516) affirmed the dissolution of Kalshi's injunction as to sports contracts, holding they are likely not swaps and Nevada law is likely not preempted, and remanded on election contracts.
Montana: Court order
Judge Donald Molloy denied Kalshi's preliminary injunction without prejudice, finding it had not shown likely irreparable harm after repeatedly agreeing to pause the case.
Source: InGame
Connecticut: State lawsuit
AG William Tong and DCP sued Kalshi in Hartford Superior Court seeking to stop its sports contracts plus restitution and civil penalties; the court denied an ex parte TRO that day, and Kalshi later removed the case to federal court.
Source: InGame
Connecticut: Court order
The court also denied Kalshi's emergency motion for an injunction pending appeal.
Source: Public Gaming Research Institute
Washington: Court order
Judge McHale's order barred Kalshi from offering or advertising sports, election, politics, entertainment, culture, technology, science and mention contracts to Washington users. It required IP and residency geofencing by August 19 and multi-source geolocation by September 2, with possible $120,000 daily penalties.
Source: Washington State Standard
Connecticut: Court order
Judge Vernon D. Oliver denied Kalshi's motion for a preliminary injunction, finding its sports contracts are not swaps protected by federal law; Kalshi appealed.
Source: Vultax lawsuit tracker
Washington: Court order
A Washington Court of Appeals commissioner denied Kalshi's emergency request to stay the injunction pending appeal.
Source: GeekWire
Utah: Court order
Judge Robert J. Shelby granted summary judgment to Utah and closed the case, holding that federal commodities law does not displace Utah's power to ban gambling, including as applied to Kalshi's sports contracts.
Source: Utah Attorney General
New York: Court order
Judge Jed Rakoff, sitting in for the assigned judge, denied the United States' emergency request for a TRO halting the attorney general's case against Kalshi.
Source: Ball Is Life / Derek Helling
New York: State lawsuit
The attorney general sued Kalshi in New York County Supreme Court (No. 453272/2026), alleging an unlicensed gambling business and seeking an injunction, restitution, disgorgement and treble penalties; Kalshi removed the case to federal court.
New York: Court order
A Second Circuit motions order denied Kalshi a temporary injunction pending appeal and referred its motion to a three-judge panel; the appeal is to be heard in tandem with two related appeals.
Arizona: Court order
The Ninth Circuit stayed Arizona's appeal of the injunction (No. 26-4281), in which Kalshi and Crypto.com's exchange (NADEX) are appellees or intervenors, until it decided the related Nevada appeals.
Washington: Court order
Judge John McHale granted the state a preliminary injunction against Kalshi, rejecting its federal preemption defense.
Source: GeekWire
New York: Court order
Judge Analisa Torres denied Kalshi's preliminary injunction, finding preemption unlikely, and dismissed the Gaming Commission itself on immunity grounds; Kalshi appealed (2d Cir. No. 26-1835).
Nevada: Court order
The Nevada Supreme Court (No. 92771) denied Kalshi's request to stay the state-court injunction.
Source: SportsBettingDime
Michigan: Court order
Judge Rosemarie Aquilina issued an ex parte 14-day temporary restraining order barring Kalshi's sports contracts for anyone in Michigan, with geolocation requirements and a $120,000 daily fine; she extended and modified it in mid-July, setting a Aug. 12, 2026 geofencing deadline.
Source: InGame
Rhode Island: Court order
The court allowed the CFTC to intervene on the exchanges' side.
Michigan: Court order
A federal court sent the state's case against Kalshi back to Ingham County Circuit Court; Kalshi appealed the remand to the Sixth Circuit (No. 26-1639).
Source: InGame
Kentucky: State lawsuit
The attorney general filed separate Franklin Circuit Court suits against KalshiEX LLC and others (No. 26-CI-00689) and QCX LLC and others (No. 26-CI-00696), alleging unlicensed sports betting.
Source: The Block
New Mexico: State lawsuit
The attorney general sued Kalshi in the First Judicial District Court, Santa Fe County (No. D-101-CV-2026-01567), alleging unlicensed sports betting and seeking an injunction and nuisance abatement.
Rhode Island: Court order
The federal court consolidated the state's enforcement case with Kalshi's suit; Polymarket US then sought its own preliminary injunction.
Source: Public Gaming Research Institute
Rhode Island: State lawsuit
About four hours later, Attorney General Neronha sued Kalshi and Polymarket US in Providence County Superior Court. The suit seeks a declaration that their sports contracts are gambling under state law, a permanent injunction, and restitution and disgorgement.
Source: SBC Americas
Washington: Court order
The Ninth Circuit denied Kalshi's request to pause the state-court litigation while it appeals the remand.
Source: DeFi Rate
Nevada: Court order
The court ordered Kalshi to geofence so it does not offer sports, election or entertainment event contracts to anyone in Nevada.
Wisconsin: Court order
In the Ho-Chunk case, Judge William Conley denied a preliminary injunction for lack of irreparable harm but let the tribe's Indian Gaming Regulatory Act claim proceed, finding it likely to succeed.
Source: Courthouse News Service
Arizona: Court order
The court granted the federal government a preliminary injunction barring Arizona's criminal and civil enforcement of its gambling and election-betting laws against event contracts on CFTC-registered exchanges.
Source: Arizona status report, 9th Cir. No. 26-4281 (Sept. 4, 2026)
Washington: Court order
U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour remanded the state's Kalshi case to King County Superior Court.
Nevada: Court order
Judge Woodbury, who had announced the ruling from the bench on April 3, 2026, entered a preliminary injunction requiring Kalshi to stop offering sports, election and entertainment contracts to Nevada residents by May 4, 2026.
Source: DeFi Rate
Ohio: Court order
The Sixth Circuit denied Kalshi's motion for an injunction pending appeal.
Wisconsin: State lawsuit
Attorney General Kaul filed three Dane County suits alleging that sports event contracts violate Wis. Stat. 945.03(1m) and create a public nuisance, seeking declarations and injunctions.
Source: Wisconsin Department of Justice
Arizona: Court order
Judge Michael Liburdi issued a temporary restraining order halting Arizona's enforcement against Kalshi; the scheduled arraignment was called off.
Source: Courthouse News (AP)
Arizona: Court order
Judge Liburdi denied Kalshi's own motion for a TRO and preliminary injunction, relying mainly on the Anti-Injunction Act; Kalshi appealed in May (9th Cir. No. 26-2978), and that appeal is stayed.
Source: InGame
Montana: Cease-and-desist
The Division sent a second cease-and-desist letter, saying the earlier forbearance depended on Kalshi's Nevada injunction, which had since been dissolved.
Source: SBC Americas
New Jersey: Court order
The Third Circuit affirmed the injunction 2-1 (Judge Porter writing, Judge Roth dissenting), finding the contracts likely swaps and New Jersey law likely preempted.
Washington: State lawsuit
Attorney General Nick Brown sued Kalshi in King County Superior Court under the Gambling Act and the Consumer Protection Act, seeking to stop the activity, recover residents' losses and obtain civil penalties. Kalshi removed the case to federal court.
Source: Washington Attorney General
Nevada: Court order
Judge Jason Woodbury granted the Board an ex parte TRO against Kalshi.
Source: Bloomberg
Arizona: Criminal charges
The attorney general filed a 20-count misdemeanor criminal information in Maricopa County Superior Court against KalshiEX LLC and Kalshi Trading LLC, covering sports and election contracts.
Source: SBC Americas
Ohio: Court order
Chief Judge Sarah D. Morrison denied Kalshi's motion for a preliminary injunction; Kalshi filed a notice of appeal the next day (6th Cir. No. 26-3196).
Michigan: State lawsuit
The attorney general, for the state and the Gaming Control Board, sued Kalshi in Ingham County Circuit Court under the Lawful Sports Betting Act and public-nuisance law.
Tennessee: Court order
Judge Trauger granted Kalshi a preliminary injunction against state enforcement, finding the contracts likely swaps and state law likely preempted; the Council itself was dismissed from the case.
Source: SBC Americas
Massachusetts: Court order
Appeals Court Justice Sabita Singh (No. 2026-J-0143) granted Kalshi's motion to stay the injunction pending appeal, without expressing a view on the merits, and expedited the appeal.
Source: Bloomberg Law
Nevada: State lawsuit
The Gaming Control Board sued Kalshi in the First Judicial District Court in Carson City, alleging unlicensed wagering.
Source: Prediction Market Litigation Tracker (mickbransfield.com)
Massachusetts: Court order
Judge Barry-Smith entered the injunction and denied Kalshi's emergency motion to stay it, allowing 30 days for compliance so Kalshi could seek a stay from the Appeals Court.
Source: InGame
Massachusetts: Court order
Suffolk Superior Court granted the attorney general's preliminary injunction barring Kalshi from offering sports event contracts in Massachusetts without a state license.
Source: ZwillGen
Tennessee: Court order
Judge Aleta Trauger granted Kalshi a temporary restraining order, allowing it to keep offering sports contracts in Tennessee.
Source: SBC Americas
Tennessee: Cease-and-desist
The Sports Wagering Council ordered the three platforms to stop offering sports event contracts to Tennesseans, void pending contracts and refund customer deposits by January 31, 2026. The letters cited tiered fines of $10,000 to $25,000 per violation and possible criminal referral.
Source: The Block
Connecticut: Cease-and-desist
DCP's Gaming Division ordered the three platforms to stop offering sports event contracts to Connecticut residents and to let residents withdraw funds.
Source: Connecticut DCP press release
Nevada: Court order
The U.S. District Court for Nevada dissolved the preliminary injunction that had shielded Kalshi from state enforcement.
Source: Prediction Market Litigation Tracker (mickbransfield.com)
California: Court order
Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley denied the tribes' motion for a preliminary injunction (month only reported); the tribes appealed.
Massachusetts: Court order
Judge Richard Stearns of the District of Massachusetts (No. 1:25-cv-12595) remanded the case to state court after Kalshi tried to remove it.
New York: Cease-and-desist
The State Gaming Commission ordered Kalshi to stop offering what it called an unlicensed mobile sports wagering platform.
Massachusetts: State lawsuit
The attorney general sued Kalshi in Suffolk Superior Court, alleging it offers sports wagering in Massachusetts without a license.
Source: SBC Americas
Maryland: Court order
Judge Adam B. Abelson of the District of Maryland denied Kalshi's request for a preliminary injunction against state enforcement; Kalshi appealed to the Fourth Circuit.
Arizona: Cease-and-desist
The Arizona Department of Gaming sent KalshiEX and its CEO a cease-and-desist letter saying Kalshi was accepting unlawful wagers.
Source: Kalshi/CFTC motion for TRO and PI, D. Ariz. CV-26-01715 (ECF 49)
New Jersey: Court order
Judge Edward Kiel of the District of New Jersey granted Kalshi a preliminary injunction barring state enforcement of its gambling laws against Kalshi's sports contracts.
Maryland: Cease-and-desist
Maryland regulators sent Kalshi a cease-and-desist letter over its sports event contracts.
Source: Prediction Market Litigation Tracker (mickbransfield.com)
Illinois: Cease-and-desist
The Illinois Gaming Board sent cease-and-desist letters to Kalshi, Crypto.com and Robinhood over unlicensed sports wagering.
Montana: Cease-and-desist
The Gambling Control Division's chief legal counsel ordered KalshiEX to stop letting people in Montana trade sports event contracts, citing state gambling and sports-wagering statutes and warning of legal action.
Source: Montana DOJ Gambling Control Division letter (via KTVH/Scripps)
Ohio: Cease-and-desist
The Ohio Casino Control Commission (OCCC) ordered Kalshi, Robinhood and Crypto.com to stop offering sports event contracts in Ohio and to confirm compliance by April 14, 2025.
Source: 13 ABC (WTVG)
New Jersey: Cease-and-desist
The Division of Gaming Enforcement ordered Kalshi to stop offering sports event contracts in New Jersey, about two months after Kalshi launched them in early 2025.
State v. operator 16
Private civil suit 9
Operator v. state 25
Supreme Court 1
Federal enforcement 2
United States v. state 9
Tribe v. operator 3
Class action 2
Operator v. federal government 2
| State | Kalshi | State status | Actions naming Kalshi |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | No restriction found | No public action found | 1 |
| Alaska | No restriction found | No public action found | 1 |
| Arizona | No restriction found | In litigation | 11 |
| Arkansas | No restriction found | No public action found | 2 |
| California | No restriction found | No public action found | 5 |
| Colorado | No restriction found | No public action found | 1 |
| Connecticut | No restriction found | In litigation | 6 |
| Delaware | No restriction found | No public action found | 1 |
| District of Columbia | No restriction found | No public action found | 1 |
| Florida | No restriction found | No public action found | None |
| Georgia | No restriction found | No public action found | None |
| Hawaii | No restriction found | No public action found | 1 |
| Idaho | No restriction found | No public action found | 1 |
| Illinois | No restriction found | In litigation | 4 |
| Indiana | No restriction found | No public action found | 1 |
| Iowa | No restriction found | In litigation | 4 |
| Kansas | No restriction found | No public action found | 2 |
| Kentucky | No restriction found | In litigation | 3 |
| Louisiana | No restriction found | No public action found | 1 |
| Maine | No restriction found | No public action found | 1 |
| Maryland | No restriction found | In litigation | 7 |
| Massachusetts | No restriction foundA January 2026 state-court injunction against Kalshi's sports contracts in Massachusetts was put on hold pending appeal in February 2026. CBS Sports reported on October 21, 2026 that Kalshi still awaits a Supreme Judicial Court ruling. A Gambling.com headline from August 25, 2026 said the ban was in force, so current status is conflicting. | In litigation | 9 |
| Michigan | Sports blockedAn Ingham County Circuit Court preliminary injunction (signed September 1, 2026) bars Kalshi's sports contracts in Michigan and requires geofencing, with $500,000-per-day fines for violations. Kalshi began restricting Michigan sports markets after a June 29, 2026 restraining order; InGame reported on August 14, 2026 that the geofence worked only on the latest app version. Kalshi's head of communications said after the June 2026 restraining order that Kalshi was implementing restrictions in Michigan. | Court order in force | 7 |
| Minnesota | No restriction found | In litigation | 2 |
| Mississippi | No restriction found | No public action found | 1 |
| Missouri | No restriction found | In litigation | 2 |
| Montana | No restriction found | Enforcement, no lawsuit | 6 |
| Nebraska | No restriction found | No public action found | 1 |
| Nevada | Sports blockedKalshi stopped new trades in sports, entertainment and election markets for Nevada users on March 21, 2026, after a state-court temporary restraining order, and told customers by email. Other markets stayed open. Nevada's Gaming Control Board said on June 1, 2026 that a state-court preliminary injunction bars Kalshi from sports-, election- and entertainment-related contracts in Nevada. Covers reported on July 27, 2026 that Kalshi agreed to a third-party geofence by August 12, 2026. | Court order in force | 11 |
| New Hampshire | No restriction found | No public action found | 2 |
| New Jersey | No restriction found | In litigation | 6 |
| New Mexico | No restriction found | In litigation | 4 |
| New York | No restriction found | In litigation | 8 |
| North Carolina | No restriction found | Law enacted | 1 |
| North Dakota | No restriction found | No public action found | None |
| Ohio | No restriction found | In litigation | 8 |
| Oklahoma | No restriction found | No public action found | 1 |
| Oregon | No restriction found | No public action found | 1 |
| Pennsylvania | No restriction found | No public action found | 1 |
| Rhode Island | No restriction found | In litigation | 7 |
| South Carolina | No restriction found | No public action found | 1 |
| South Dakota | No restriction found | No public action found | 1 |
| Tennessee | No restriction found | In litigation | 6 |
| Texas | No restriction found | No public action found | 1 |
| Utah | No restriction foundAfter a federal judge ruled in August 2026 that Utah may enforce its gambling laws against Kalshi, CDC Gaming reported Kalshi was still available in Utah. No later source confirming a Utah block was found. | In litigation | 5 |
| Vermont | No restriction found | No public action found | 1 |
| Virginia | No restriction found | No public action found | 1 |
| Washington | Sports blockedA King County Superior Court order announced August 13, 2026 bars Kalshi from sports, elections, politics, entertainment, culture, tech and science, and mentions contracts in Washington, with geofencing due by September 2, 2026. Commodities, climate, economics and finance contracts remain allowed. Public Gaming reported on August 21, 2026 that Kalshi had messaged Washington users that these categories were no longer tradable there. | Court order in force | 9 |
| West Virginia | No restriction found | No public action found | None |
| Wisconsin | No restriction found | In litigation | 6 |
| Wyoming | No restriction found | No public action found | 1 |
What we couldn't confirm: Kalshi does not appear to publish its own list of US states where it, or its sports contracts, are unavailable. None was found in the help center articles opened (signup, verification, regulation, Market FAQs, trading from outside the US, taxes), the FAQ, the Member Agreement (which lists only foreign countries and is undated), or the market-integrity and family-safety pages. Several help collections show more articles than could be listed, so a state article cannot be fully ruled out. The web-search budget ran out before more searching could be done. MI, NV and WA in sports_restricted_states come from court orders plus Kalshi's notices to users as reported by the press (an email quoted for Nevada, paraphrased for Michigan and Washington), not from a Kalshi-published list. CBS Sports (2026-10-21) also says Kalshi sports contracts are not available in Michigan, Nevada and Washington. Kalshi's January 24, 2025 blog post said its sports contracts were '100% legal in all 50 states.' Later court orders make this outdated, and it is not used here as an availability statement. Massachusetts: could not confirm whether Kalshi currently offers sports contracts there. Bloomberg Law (2026-02-18) reported the injunction was stayed pending appeal; a Gambling.com headline (2026-08-25) said the ban 'stays in force'; CBS Sports (2026-10-21) said Kalshi awaits a Supreme Judicial Court ruling and listed MA sports contracts as live. Utah: CDC Gaming (2026-08-11) said Kalshi was still available. Kalshi's current Utah status was not confirmed, and CBS Sports' October 21, 2026 table entry for Utah was ambiguous. Ohio and Tennessee: the Sixth Circuit (2026-09-25) lets both states enforce their gambling laws against Kalshi. No source said Kalshi has stopped sports contracts in either state, and CBS Sports' table describes Ohio sports markets as live. Nevada: not confirmed whether Kalshi's third-party geofence was live by the August 12, 2026 deadline, or whether any contempt finding or daily fine was imposed. Minimum age: Kalshi says 18+. The Member Agreement also requires members to be 'of the age of majority in Your state of residence'; Kalshi does not name any state where that is above 18, and no state-specific exception was found. Tax: Kalshi's tax article gives no IRS dollar thresholds or issue dates. It lists 1099-B only for crypto-transfer proceeds and does not say a 1099-B is issued for event-contract trading gains. Partner apps: not verified whether Robinhood still offers Kalshi contracts after moving to its own Rothera exchange, or the current status of PrizePicks' Kalshi integration.