Latest

Checked Oct. 21, 2026

Operator v. state

QCX LLC v. Wilson

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, 2:26-cv-01502

Pending

Complaint filed Oct. 16, 2026 under 42 U.S.C. 1983; assigned to Judge Douglas R. Cole. Summons issued; no ruling.

The question

Whether the Commodity Exchange Act preempts Ohio gambling or sports-wagering law as applied to event contracts listed on a CFTC-designated contract market.

Polymarket's U.S. exchange sued Ohio officials three weeks after the Sixth Circuit rejected Kalshi's preemption arguments in the Ohio case.

Open question

Resolved

  1. Will a Sixth Circuit panel side with Kalshi against Ohio and Tennessee?

    The panel affirmed the denial of Kalshi's injunction in Ohio and vacated Kalshi's injunction in Tennessee and remanded. Kalshi has asked for rehearing. Sixth Circuit Nos. 26-3196 and 26-5235. Source: Opinion

    No

Docket timeline

  1. Summons issued and counsel appear (per DeFi Rate).

    Source: defirate.com

  2. Complaint filed.

    Source: dockets.justia.com

Sources

  1. Justia docket: QCX LLC v. Wilson, S.D. Ohio 2:26-cv-01502
  2. DeFi Rate prediction market lawsuit tracker (updated 2026-10-20)